[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?
From: |
Federico Beffa |
Subject: |
Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"? |
Date: |
Sun, 8 May 2016 18:23:19 +0200 |
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Alex Kost <address@hidden> wrote:
> I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why
> does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of
> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to
> use "/share/emacs/site-lisp".
>
> I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their
> elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by
> default), and emacs-build-system can just use
> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories.
>
> "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think?
Answer here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00398.html
Regards,
Fede
- Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/08
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?,
Federico Beffa <=
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/08
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/08
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/09
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/09
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/05/16
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/17
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/05/19
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/20
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/20
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/21