[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: avr-gcc
From: |
Thompson, David |
Subject: |
Re: avr-gcc |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:14:51 -0400 |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Thompson, David
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't know why it's including headers from the host system's libc.
> Manolis was able to get past it by including a cross-libc built for
> i686. Does this seem wrong to anyone else? Any thoughts on what
> might be going on here?
Well, with a super nasty hack I've been able to successfully build an
AVR toolchain without using that cross-libc!
The issue is that, at least on x86_64, the avr-libc build happens
without the __x86_64__ preprocessor definition. Adding it manually
with the make flag 'CFLAGS=-D__x86_64__' yields a successful build.
Does anyone have an idea what is going wrong here? If so, how can we
make sure that all platforms will build this thing correctly? I use
avr-gcc on ARM machines, for example.
Thanks,
- Dave
- Re: avr-gcc, Thompson, David, 2016/04/12
- Re: avr-gcc,
Thompson, David <=
- Re: avr-gcc, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/13
- Re: avr-gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/04/14
- Re: avr-gcc, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/14
- Re: avr-gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Andy Wingo, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Andy Wingo, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/15
- Re: avr-gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/04/16