[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defined?
From: |
Egil Moeller |
Subject: |
Re: defined? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:04:38 +0100 (CET) |
> Aha! defined? looks interesting
>
> (help defined?)
>
> `defined?' is a primitive procedure in the (guile) module.
>
> - Scheme Procedure: defined? sym [env]
> Return `#t' if SYM is defined in the lexical environment ENV.
> When ENV is not specified, look in the top-level environment as
> defined by the current module.
Yes, and I had allrready found that. I even wrote that in the original
mesage. But there seems to be no wayd of getting an environment for the
current closure. interaction-environment does not do the tric, and the
return-value of (procedure-environment (lambda () 'foo)) does not help
neither (it is of the wrong type!)...
> Nothing bad intended with this message.
Hehe. Except that I had allready done what you told me, and still failed
to succeed, it was a good RTFM :)
/Egil
--
http://redhog.org
GPG Public key: http://redhog.org/PGP%20Public%20key.asc
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
- defined?, Egil Moeller, 2003/01/12
- Re: defined?, Matt Hellige, 2003/01/12
- Re: defined?, Egil Moeller, 2003/01/12
- Re: defined?, Matt Hellige, 2003/01/13
- Re: defined?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/01/13
- Re: defined?, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/01/13
- Re: defined?, Egil Moeller, 2003/01/13
- Re: defined?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/01/13
Re: defined?, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/01/13
- Re: defined?,
Egil Moeller <=