Re: defined?

[Matt Hellige]

[Egil Moeller <address@hidden>]
> The problem is
> 
> guile> (let ((b 5)) (eval 'b  (interaction-environment)))
> <unnamed port>: In expression b:
> <unnamed port>: Unbound variable: b
> ABORT: (unbound-variable)

Yes, good point. I suppose the problem is that you want a closure
representing the actual current environment rather than the top-level.
It seems like there should be a way to do this...?

Matt

-- 
Matt Hellige                  address@hidden
http://matt.immute.net