Re: Bug in and-map and or-map? What am I doing wrong?

[Keith Wright]

> From: Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden>
> 
> This might, by the way, be a sensible way to deal with these things:  In
> addition to the RnRS style functions, there are additinal ones with a '*',
> using the meaning of the '*' in regexps to indicate repetition from zero
> up to an infinite number of times: =*?, eq*?, eqv*? ...

(eq? =*? =)

R5RS already _requires_ = to take two or more arguments.  So =*?
is redundant (and ugly and hard to type).