Re: Bug in and-map and or-map? What am I doing wrong?

[Alejandro Forero Cuervo]

    > Hmmm, according to R5RS, `eq?' expects _exactly_ two arguments, and
    > `=' expects two or more arguments ...

    Right, seems to be worth fixing.

While the R5RS does say this, that I regard this as a nice extension of
Guile that I really like.

It allows you to do things like

    (apply equal? list-with-objects) ,

which, in my opinion, are nice.  Otherwise, we would be have to deal
with having to iterate on the lists everywhere.

I think introducing this change would break a lot of code.  At least
it would break a lot of my code (and, from his implementation of
and-map and or-map, I guess Neil Jerram's).

Hmm.

Alejo.
http://bachue.com/alejo

--
The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution.
      -- Albert Einstein.

$0='!/sfldbi!yjoV0msfQ!sfiupob!utvK'x44;print map{("\e[7m \e[0m",chr ord
(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%77]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',($F='F'x19).
"F0F3E0607879CC1E0F0F339F3FF399C666733333CCF87F99E6133999999E67CFFCCF3".
"219CC1CCC033E7E660198CCE4E66798303873CCE60F3387$F"#Don't you love Perl?

pgpeoQzsqlnFV.pgp
Description: PGP signature