[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE FAQ
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE FAQ |
Date: |
23 Jan 2001 21:01:26 +0000 |
>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Petersen <address@hidden> writes:
Stefan> I've been checking it out and it has improvred
Stefan> considerable. It is very nice reading indeed, though there
Stefan> are still some comments, "Anyone should do this bla
Stefan> bla".
Yes, I'm aware of those; they're one of the things that I'd like to
deal with before release.
Stefan> And I assume you're aware of the fact that r5rs
Stefan> doesn't build. At least not to dvi.
Yes. The problem here is that r5rs.texi is autogenerated by a tool
from the original LaTeX for R5RS, and it's not clear that it's worth
fixing the errors in r5rs.texi (some of which are non-trivial) when
people would be better advised to start from the LaTeX anyway.
>> I realise that this situation (needing to do CVS) is far from
>> ideal, and am working towards a documentation release as soon
>> as I can get there. (Target: end of March.)
Stefan> Looking forward to it.
Thanks for the encouragement.
Neil
- GUILE FAQ, Nathan Lovell, 2001/01/20
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Roger Faust, 2001/01/20
- GUILE FAQ, pax!, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/22
- Message not available
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/23
- guile-doc html Re: GUILE FAQ, Steve Tell, 2001/01/23
- Re: guile-doc html Re: GUILE FAQ, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/24
- Re: guile-doc html Re: GUILE FAQ, Steve Tell, 2001/01/24
- Re: guile-doc html Re: GUILE FAQ, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/26
- Re: guile-doc html Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/26