guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: crash on macOS with dlsym RTLD_LOCAL


From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
Subject: Re: crash on macOS with dlsym RTLD_LOCAL
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:06:59 -0700

I have posted a message to Apple's forums to see if there's any luck:

https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/689991

Aleix

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
<aconchillo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I did a little bit more research. The combination that actually fails
> is RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL (what guile uses). So, you can actually
> use:
>
> - RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL
> - RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL
> - RTLD_NOW | RTLD_LOCAL
>
> I found the source code of dyld
>
>    https://opensource.apple.com/source/dyld/dyld-852.2/
>
> But I have no clue how to build this, I tried it but failed with
> missing dependencies. In any case, I provided a patch so at least we
> can use Guile on macOS.
>
> Best,
>
> Aleix
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:48 PM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
> <aconchillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to load guile-grcypt with guile 3.0.7 and after my previous
> > fix 
> > (https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=1f100a4f20c3a6e57922fb26fce212997e2a03cb)
> > guile-gcrypt still does not load properly.
> >
> > TLDR; Using RTLD_LOCAL instead of RTLD_GLOBAL (default) causes issues on 
> > macOS.
> >
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/module/system/foreign-library.scm#n181
> >
> > In the case of guile-gcrypt this is what I'm getting:
> >
> > -------------------------
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (gcrypt hmac))
> > dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __gcry_check_version
> >   Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.dylib
> >   Expected in: flat namespace
> >
> > dyld: Symbol not found: __gcry_check_version
> >   Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.dylib
> >   Expected in: flat namespace
> > -------------------------
> >
> > Looking at gcrypt symbols I can see:
> >
> > ❯ nm -gU /usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.dylib | grep gcry_check_version
> > 0000000000005954 T __gcry_check_version
> > 0000000000002aa7 T _gcry_check_version
> >
> > Actually in libgcrypt the public functions are: gcry_check_version and
> > _gcry_check_version (no extra underscore). I think extra underscores
> > are automatically added when building the library but I'm not sure why
> > and when and what systems. And when you call dlsym() you don't need to
> > add those extra underscores.
> >
> > The following code (which uses RTLD_GLOBAL) works fine:
> >
> > ./a.out gcry_check_version
> >
> > -------------------------
> > #include <dlfcn.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> >
> > int
> > main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > {
> >   char* (*fptr)(char *);
> >   void *handle = dlopen("/usr/local/lib/libgcrypt.dylib", RTLD_LAZY |
> > RTLD_GLOBAL);
> >   if (handle == NULL) {
> >     printf("OOOPS: %s\n", dlerror());
> >   } else {
> >     *(void **)(&fptr) = dlsym(handle, argv[1]);
> >     if (fptr == NULL) {
> >        printf("NOT FOUND: %s : %s\n", argv[1], dlerror());
> >     } else {
> >        printf("FOUND: %s %s\n", argv[1], (*fptr)(NULL));
> >     }
> >   }
> >   return 0;
> > }
> > -------------------------
> >
> > But if we change to RTLD_LOCAL we get a crash like in guile's case.
> >
> > Sorry for being too vague but I'm not familiar with how all this
> > works. All I know is that using RTLD_GLOBAL fixes the issue.
> >
> > Also, from dlopen man page I read:
> >
> > -------------------------
> >     RTLD_GLOBAL  Symbols exported from this image (dynamic library or
> > bundle) will be available to any images build with -flat_namespace
> > option to
> >                   ld(1) or to calls to dlsym() when using a special handle.
> >
> >      RTLD_LOCAL   Symbols exported from this image (dynamic library or
> > bundle) are generally hidden and only availble to dlsym() when
> > directly using
> >                   the handle returned by this call to dlopen().
> > -------------------------
> >
> > But I don't fully get what this means.
> >
> > Any help would be really appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Aleix



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]