Re: Immutable rnrs hashtable

[Ian Price]

Sjoerd van Leent Privé <address@hidden> writes:

> Btw, isn't their a hashtable which is more pure in it's
> implementation? The RNRS and SRFI-69 versions are having quite some
> side-effects. I would have expected a method like "hashtable-add"
> which copies an existing hashtable, adds values and returns a new
> hashtable. I know, I prefer pure functional implementations...

You could look up vhashes in the manual. Alternatively, if your data
has an ordering you can use (pfds bbtrees) from my pfds collection[0]


0. https://github.com/ijp/pfds or guild install pfds
-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"