guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Do you recognize these modules?


From: Noah Lavine
Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules?
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:59:06 -0400

And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you
mean that I should remove them in the same patches that import the
documentation? I thought it was easier to do it separately, but I
could probably do it that way too.

Noah

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes
> to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I
> believe the second patch from earlier should work.)
>
> I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines.
>
> Noah
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this
>>> documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready
>>> to apply to stable-2.0.
>>
>> Cool.  I applied the first one.  When applying the rest, I got:
>>
>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//lineio.texi:12: Prev reference to 
>> nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: `Eq? Hash Consing' has no 
>> Up field (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//gap-buffer.texi:12: Next reference to 
>> nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//guile.texi:375: Menu reference to 
>> nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: warning: unreferenced node 
>> `Eq? Hash Consing'.
>>     makeinfo: Removing output file `guile.info' due to errors; use --force 
>> to preserve.
>>     make[4]: *** [guile.info] Error 1
>>
>> As Thien-Thi suggests, it's probably good to filter out the
>> @twerpcommentary etcetera in your next patches.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Andy
>> --
>> http://wingolog.org/

Attachment: 0001-Remove-twerp-comments-in-documentation.patch
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]