[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: Guile: What's wrong with this? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:08:07 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111220 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 01/04/12 11:43, Andy Wingo wrote:
The correct behavior is the status quo. We are considering adding a
hack to produce different behavior for compatibility purposes. We don't
have to worry about correctness in that case, only compatibility. IMO
anyway :)
It would be a nice added benefit if it worked as one would expect.
viz., you make actual, writable copies of strings you pull in so that
if the string-upcase function were to modify its input, then it
would not affect other SCMs with values that happen to be the same
sequence of bytes.
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, (continued)
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Fixed string corruption bugs (was Guile: What's wrong with this?), Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/07
- Re: Fixed string corruption bugs, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/07
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/04