[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git push weird?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: git push weird? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:39:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
() Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:56:19 +0200
These are “merge commits”. Please avoid pushing any merge commits as
they make the history non-linear for no reason in such situations.
See ‘git rebase’ and the like for how to avoid it.
OK.
Besides, did you mean to push to ‘master’?
Yes, but now i believe that that was fuzzy thinking, not to mention
in disregard of my agreement to not do so made several months ago
(which i didn't remember until just after pressing RET -- sigh). :-(
I will push only to ttn/* henceforth.
Could you please undo the damage on ‘master’?
FWIW, the commit edb3cfc37de8c216e3b1c06970ef39e3638560be,
aka "[maint] Add configure.ac abstraction: GUILE_CONFIG_SCRIPT",
is ready for review.
The other commit 0faca15c33cfbe1ef25fd6b4bbc7f92b57659345,
aka "Init shell var properly in git-version-gen", is functional,
and would also be ready for review, were it not my belief that the
change should actually be effected by import from upstream (gnulib).
Am i missing something? That's the commit i wanted to omit.
thi
- git push weird?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Xiangfu Liu, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: git push weird?, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Andy Wingo, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Andy Wingo, 2010/06/15
- Re: git push weird?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/06/15