Re: r6rs standard libraries

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> Beyond that, we're just talking about two identifiers.

[...]

> Yes, the names are a burden on the namespace, but I don't think they're
> "creeping", in the sense that they will expand in the future.
>
> If you're dead-set against r6rs support by default, that's cool. But if
> not, have I managed to convince you that we should have these by
> default? :)

Well, yes.  :-)

I don’t have a strong opinion, and you’re probably right on these.

Thanks,
Ludo’.