[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi-18 requirements
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: srfi-18 requirements |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:06:13 -0500 |
On Jan 24, 2008 8:38 PM, Julian Graham <address@hidden> wrote:
> > - we apply the generic / bug fix patch that you already posted, except
> > without the extra thread_admin_mutex locking (which I think we
> > concluded we can't justify) - that will be to HEAD
>
> Agreed, though see below...
Actually, in light of Neil's apt suggestion that we get this thing
back on track, I resolve to stop fussing about deadlocks for the time
being -- find attached the patch described above (1 deadlock -- the
jmpbuf critical section one -- and the thread-specific mutex). Let me
know if I've missed anything.
Regards,
Julian
srfi-18-bugs.HEAD.patch.20080127
Description: Binary data
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, (continued)
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/04
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/01/06
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/08
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/01/10
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/16
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/01/19
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/23
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/01/23
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/24
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/01/24
- Re: srfi-18 requirements,
Julian Graham <=
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/01/08