[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: procedure-name on procedure with setter
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: procedure-name on procedure with setter |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:05:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> I wrote:
>>
>> This would be for 1.6 too. Perhaps other non-closures should be
>> recognised by scm_m_define too. Would everything passing
>> scm_procedure_p be ok?
>
> I made an executive decision to use scm_procedure_p, but I left 1.6
> alone.
That sounds good to me. Am I right in thinking that the main
practical impact of this is in backtraces?
Regards,
Neil