|
| From: | Kevin Ryde |
| Subject: | Re: procedure-name on procedure with setter |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:16:43 +1100 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
I wrote: > > This would be for 1.6 too. Perhaps other non-closures should be > recognised by scm_m_define too. Would everything passing > scm_procedure_p be ok? I made an executive decision to use scm_procedure_p, but I left 1.6 alone.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |