[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8 status and 64-bit data corruption
|
From: |
Bill Schottstaedt |
|
Subject: |
Re: 1.8 status and 64-bit data corruption |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:45:17 -0700 |
> But I don't quite follow why a remember would be wanted in
> SCM_VALIDATE_CELL. I'd have thought it was in fact a good thing if
> the "cell" value went dead if not being checked.
Hunh!? This whole thread is about building guile in gcc 4.n on a
64-bit machine. It doesn't build, or run unless you make the change
I suggested.
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: 1.8 status and 64-bit data corruption,
Bill Schottstaedt <=