[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: macros, procedure->macro
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: macros, procedure->macro |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 11:53:26 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> I am currently changing the definition of define-class accordingly.
> However, I am not sure which of the following solutions to choose:
[...]
> * change the expanded code of define-class to hold all necessary
> instructions to do the module manipulations. In this case, the
> mmacro would return the following:
[...]
> Which solution should be used? I will try to update define-generic and
> define-accessor accordingly.
I have decided for the solution above to avoid having to export an
additional binding. Now, define-class, define-generic and define-accessor
are now fixed such that they will work even if mmacros are expanded before
execution.
That means, scm_makmacro and procedure->macro are not used anymore within
guile. If nobody objects, I will make them deprecated. The next step is
to get rid of acros.
Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, (continued)
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/14
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Marius Vollmer, 2002/07/15
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Neil Jerram, 2002/07/15
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/16
Re: macros, procedure->macro, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/03
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/04
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/10
- Re: macros, procedure->macro,
Dirk Herrmann <=
- Re: macros, procedure->macro, Marius Vollmer, 2002/07/13