[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we already have docs about modules, loading (non-toplevel), etc.
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Do we already have docs about modules, loading (non-toplevel), etc. |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:33:51 -0800 |
From: Rob Browning <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:40:15 -0600
Do we have any docs (or is anyone already planning to write docs)
about the interactions between load, eval, define-module, use-modules,
gh_eval_str, gh_lookup, (define foo (lambda ...)) and the current
module[1]?
the docs describe module system usage in various places, but don't go
into a lot of detail. i think case analyses as you propose (as well as
some more detail) would be a good addition.
i expressed interest in doing some module system doc work:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-devel/2001-November/004154.html
(thread: "Argh! Module system frustration.")
but haven't started, and am happy to relinquish the initiative to you.
thi