[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nested define syntax
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: nested define syntax |
Date: |
03 Nov 2001 20:56:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> > But I could also image that we might want that syntax for
> > some other extension that is less elegant but more practical. Common
> > Lisp has function names that are lists of symbols, for example. The
> > setter of FOO is called (SETTER FOO). That's certainly an elegant
> > concept as well, and it is extensible. Just one half of a thought.
>
> That's fine for Comon Lisp, where functions are defined with (defun
> FUNCTION-NAME LAMBDA-LIST BODY...). It does not fit at all into the
> Scheme define syntax, though.
Yep, probably.
- Re: nested define syntax, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/11/01
- Re: nested define syntax, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/01
- Re: nested define syntax, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/06
- Re: nested define syntax, Maciej Stachowiak, 2001/11/06
- Re: nested define syntax, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/11/07
- Re: nested define syntax, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/07
- Re: nested define syntax, Evan Prodromou, 2001/11/08
- Re: nested define syntax, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/10
- Re: nested define syntax, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/10
- Re: nested define syntax, Maciej Stachowiak, 2001/11/10