[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nested define syntax
From: |
Maciej Stachowiak |
Subject: |
Re: nested define syntax |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:42:28 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On 10Nov2001 01:07PM (+0100), Dirk Herrmann wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I think, too. But, if people like it, I don't mind too
> much - although I don't think that it improves the readability of the
> code. What I don't like is having such extensions being the default.
> For those who want to write portable code this is not very helpful. It
> means you have to provide something like gcc's -ansi and -pedantic options
> to support people to find non-portable stuff in their code.
>
Perhaps a non-extended define could be provided in the R5RS module.
- Maciej
- Re: nested define syntax, (continued)