[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:56:19 +0200 (MEST) |
On 7 Sep 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 2 Sep 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> >
> > > So we probably need some scm_str2string() and scm_str2symbol() - and
> > > choose
> > > a better name for them [...]
> >
> > I agree. However, what speaks against the names scm_str2string and
> > scm_str2symbol? I like these names since in the line of scm_mem2symbol
> > they go along nicely with the C library names strcpy and memcpy.
>
> Ok, so that we now agreed on their name, any chance to get them added ?
scm_str2symbol was already there (at least in the head branch). I have
added scm_str2string.
Thanks,
Dirk Herrmann
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Marius Vollmer, 2001/09/01
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/01
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/02
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/02
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dave Lambert, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/07
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr,
Dirk Herrmann <=