[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile build process...
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Guile build process... |
Date: |
06 Aug 2001 23:16:25 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Daniel Skarda <address@hidden> writes:
> * (documentation snarfing) Why .doc files in libguile/ looks so inefficient
> and
> inelegant? I do not know whether I did something wrong during
> configuration,
> but eval.doc has on my computer almost 0.5MB (and it looks like raw output
> from preprocessor :-). All files together 9.5MB...
gah. I've just never measured that...
I should make .doc files be texinfo, I guess.
> [Purist's corner] Move snarf scripts/executables outside libguile directory
> (possibly to to guile-core/utils:) and process of documentation snarfing
> itself to doc directory (and also scan other directories - for example srfi
> comes in mind first ... :)
I've never understood why the srfi's have a directory of their own at
all, now that you mention it.
> * (suggestion) Extract all common rules (for creating .x files etc) into
> guile-core/Make.rules and include it from Makefile.am (automake allows
> including files).
perhaps, perhaps.
--
Shit doesn't hurt the world. It provides valuable fertilizer to help
plants grow, grass to help cows, and at least 33% of the content of
off-brand chocolates. --Dave Lynch in rec.music.progressive