[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2
From: |
NIIBE Yutaka |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2 |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:42:30 +0900 (JST) |
My idea is, perhaps, quite different. I think that we don't need to
support C binding for module. I think that it is cleaner to define
as:
The module is the one which provides Scheme binding.
Then, we don't need version number for modules. I mean, the modules
are just depend on Guile version. We don't need to support multiple
implementation for modules.
If it is OK, we just put the modules into
/usr/lib/guile/VERSION_OF_GUILE/MODULE.so
As Guile knows its version, there's no confusion to load modules
compiled for other version's Guile.
--
- [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2,
NIIBE Yutaka <=
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/15
- Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2, Rob Browning, 2001/04/15