Re: [PATCH] Thread Plug-in Support #2

[Rob Browning]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> OK, this seems like a reasonably good default position.  Though it
> still leaves open the questions of how do we deal with the
> versioning from the dynamic-link level (which as you point out
> perhaps depends on libtdl's behavior), and whether or not we want to
> have any versioning for guile modules (i.e. following something like
> the libtool model):

Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention.  Before I accidentally
inspire us go off the deep end or anything, we should proably consider
what other systems do (other schemes, perl, python, etc.) and see if
they shed any light on the issue.  Maybe I'm concerned for nothing and
there's a fairly simple solution...

-- 
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930