[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
Subject: |
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0 |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Feb 2001 11:19:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.96 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 04 Feb 2001 15:56:33 +0100,
Miroslav Silovic wrote:
>
> > I have commited my initial version of a binary loader. Currently,
> > it supports all immediates, conses, symbols, strings, and keywords.
>
> My application is currently storing closures into smobs (don't ask ;) ).
> Have you slated closures for the future version?
I'm not sure about the current implementation of closures, but
with my vm, sure, I will support them. In my vm, closures are
merely bytecodes + environments, and environments are just vectors
of variables.
If you dump your closures to a network port, you'll even be able
to execute them on another machine.. theoretically.
Kei
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, (continued)
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/06
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/06
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/07
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/08
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/19
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/02/04
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0,
Keisuke Nishida <=