Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1

[Keisuke Nishida]

At 07 Feb 2001 12:44:55 +0200,
Michael Livshin wrote:
> 
> > In the future, I guess smobs and classes should be defined in
> > association with specific modules.  That way, we can determine
> > each smob and class by a name like "guile::core::type::keyword".
> 
> hmm.  Guile is, more or less, a Scheme implementation ;).  the
> Schemey way is to have names only for _bindings_, not objects.

Why don't you consider the above name to be a _binding_, then? :)
Looking up a smob type by name is just a binding, isn't it?

Kei