[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave and Guile?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Octave and Guile? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:54:39 -0600 (MDT) |
Guile is the GNU standard extensibility package, so it is important
for Octave to use Guile rather than Python, even if the Python license
incompatibility issue did not exist.
Perhaps merger is not the right word -- I'm not talking about merging
numerical tools with the Guile core, but about replacing Octave's
interpreter with Guile, and writing a translator for Octave's language
into Guile.
Ideally the translator would be written in Scheme, but to make the job
easier you could take your existing parser and make it output Scheme
code, and then turn it into a function that could be called from
Scheme. This might be fairly easy for you to do. Later on someone
could rewrite it as a Scheme program.
- Re: Octave and Guile?, Nicolas Neuss, 2000/09/14
- Re: Octave and Guile?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/19
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Keisuke Nishida, 2000/09/19
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/19
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/19
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/20
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Keisuke Nishida, 2000/09/21
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/21
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Karl M. Hegbloom, 2000/09/19
- Re: VM: direct vs indirect threading, Keisuke Nishida, 2000/09/19