[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TPM support status ?
From: |
Michael Gorven |
Subject: |
Re: TPM support status ? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:40:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 22:44:18 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> But why can't I generate my keys on first use? Or why do I need
> manufacturer's signature?
You don't.
--
http://michael.gorven.za.net
PGP Key ID 1E016BE8
S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: TPM support status ?, (continued)
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Duboucher Thomas, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Duboucher Thomas, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Duboucher Thomas, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Duboucher Thomas, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?,
Michael Gorven <=
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/19
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michael Gorven, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michael Gorven, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michael Gorven, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michael Gorven, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20