|
From: | John Stanley |
Subject: | Re: status grub2 port of grub-legasy map command |
Date: | Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:55:30 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) |
I have also incorporated your mmap services patch as well (again with minor mods to build in r2106). My question at this point, is how best to incorporate mmap services into drivemap. I see that in mmap/i386/pc/mmap.c there is some sort of support for int12 and int15 services. Should I incorporate the drivemap int13 handler here ? Looks relatively straightforward -- just insert the asm handler into mmap/i386/pc/mmap_helper.S and update mmap/i386/pc/mmap.c -- (except for how I place the mapped drives table), or, should I use the mmap.c code as a template for the drivemap int13 handler plus mapped drives table ?
thanks for any help/suggestions, John phcoder wrote:
I haven't yet looked in depth in drivemap patch but it has some problems. It uses preboot hook interface for which I proposed an update in my recent patch "preboot hooks". Also it doesn't update memorymap correctly. For this it should use my "mmap services" interfaceJohn Stanley wrote:Thanks Felix,Hurm.. Well, if anyone is interested, I have just made a couple of additional updates to the drivemap.path.8 code, and now with r2104 the "unaligned pointer" issue is gone, and it is working great on my systems. I can post the patch if you or anyone else is interested.John Felix Zielcke wrote:Am Montag, den 13.04.2009, 21:03 -0400 schrieb John Stanley:Hi all,I was wondering what the current status of a grub2 port of the grub-0.97 "map" and "rootnoverify" commands is? I have found some work done to this end in the "drivemap.patch" work, but I find nothing more recent than drivemap.patch.8 dated around Aug 2008.The current status of it are exactly what you found out. I don't know if that'll ever change.Could anyone give me any pointers/direction on what might be happening here? Could it be that the "norootverify"-functionality of grub-legasy is lacking here? Or, perhaps, that the "--force" option is not being honored ?rootnoverify isn't needed anymore, because root is now just a variable and not anymore a command which tried to verify it. So basically rootnoverify is default now. chainloader --force just skips the check for 0xaa55, normally it shouldn't be needed with a valid windows bootsector._______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |