[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275
From: |
David Miller |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:23:30 -0700 (PDT) |
From: Robert Millan <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:22:34 +0100
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:41:52AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> > I don't see why
> > sth like
> > (/address@hidden,600000/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden,1)
> > is a problem.
>
> FWIW, I like this much better than replacing our comma separator with
> something else, thereby making GRUB inconsistent among platforms.
I'm fine with this kind of scheme too.
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, (continued)
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, Robert Millan, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/18
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/21
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, phcoder, 2009/03/22
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, David Miller, 2009/03/22
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275, Robert Millan, 2009/03/22
- Re: GRUB device names wrt. ieee1275,
David Miller <=