[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:43:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:48:26PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Index: configure.ac
> ===================================================================
> --- configure.ac (revision 1893)
> +++ configure.ac (working copy)
> @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@
> TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -malign-jumps=1 -malign-loops=1
> -malign-functions=1"
> fi
> fi
> +
> + # Force long calls on PowerPC.
> + if test "x$target_cpu" = xpowerpc; then
> + TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -mlongcall"
> + fi
> fi
IIRC we had a case/esac stanza for $target_cpu already. Shouldn't this be added
there instead?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: PPC64, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64, Hollis Blanchard, 2008/11/04
- PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Robert Millan, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Pavel Roskin, 2008/11/04
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Pavel Roskin, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Hollis Blanchard, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/05
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Robert Millan, 2008/11/06
- Re: PPC64 mlongcall gcc flag, Manoel, 2008/11/06