[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks)
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:01:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Saturday 22 October 2005 01:53 pm, Timothy Baldwin wrote:
> That is exactly my point. POSIX uses off_t as a byte counts into files, the
> type we are discussing the name of is used for sector counts.
OK. That makes sense.
However, I do not like grub_sector_t. For me, this is still an address or an
offset. So it should be called something like grub_disk_addr_t or
grub_sector_offset_t.
> > > Also grub_off_t is used in kern/mm.c to count bytes of memory.
> >
> > What is bad?
>
> It should use grub_size_t for memory, in order follow POSIX.
It's true. So we must fix it.
Okuji
- [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Timothy Baldwin, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Marco Gerards, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Marco Gerards, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Timothy Baldwin, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/10/21
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Timothy Baldwin, 2005/10/22
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks),
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Timothy Baldwin, 2005/10/28
Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks), Timothy Baldwin, 2005/10/23