Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks)

[Timothy Baldwin]

On Friday 21 Oct 2005 23:18, Marco Gerards wrote:

> Why did you choose this name?  What about using grub_sector_t instead
> as name?

I now see Linux uses sector_t.

Revised patch using grub_sector_t and definition higher up types.h:
http://www.majoroak.f2s.com/tim/grub/patches/grub2-patch14b.diff.gz

It needs testing on PowerPC and SPARC.

> I still have to look at the RISC OS patches you sent in so far.  I
> hope you can still wait a bit, my own hacking already consumes all
> time I have... :-/.  Sorry for this very long delay.

I've merged some bug fixes into the patches they correct, and added rules for
your parser. See: http://www.majoroak.f2s.com/tim/grub/RISC_OS/

Good luck with your exams.


-- 
Member AFFS, WYLUG, SWP (UK), UAF, RESPECT, StWC
No to software patents!    Victory to the iraqi resistance!

pgpvu2QxWJc9X.pgp
Description: PGP signature