Re: [DISCUSSION] Grub2 Improvements

[Yoshinori K. Okuji]

On Monday 15 August 2005 09:27, address@hidden wrote:
> I would agree with this. We should have a stable basis on which we can
> improve grub2. There are so many improvments, e.g. vesafb module and
> many others, and later a graphical menu, but we dont have a structure
> for a menu entry (or a stable). Other modules/improvement uses this
> basis and when this basis changes, parts of grub2/modules must be
> rewritten to fit to the basis. We should create a list of improvments
> (all the improvments which occurs in the list) and set priorities. We
> should cralify which improvements apear in the next release and which
> not, ...

Do not use "we should", when "we" do not include yourself.

I do not like your idea. I have already said that we do not need branching at 
the moment. If you need stability, use GRUB Legacy. That's it.

Okuji