Re: normal/cmdline bug & patch

[Tomas Ebenlendr]

> address@hidden (Tomas Ebenlendr) writes:
> 
> 
> > I also sugested that if we want users not confused by 2 versions of
> > modules ve may add automatic loading of 'normal mode module variants' of
> > each 'rescue mode module variant'. (e.g. _chain.mod is loaded, we load
> > normal.mod and it automatically loads chain.mod, we then use insmod
> > _linux.mod and normal.mod will also load linux.mod).
> 
> Will this work in a hard-coded way or a flexible way, comparable to
> module loading (and dependencies) on linux?
> 
> I should catch up with my email and read the discussion...
> 
> --
> Marco

This was not discussed. I prefer here (in this case) hardcoding. At
normal mode entrance (rescue cmd normal) and normal mode insmod 
will be checked if module is named in special way.
-- 
                                 Tomas 'ebi' Ebenlendr
                                 http://get.to/ebik
                                 PF 2004.45785221868