[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular.
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular. |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2016 15:16:07 +0200 (CEST) |
>> groff -P -y -P U -Tpdf z.tr > z.pdf
>
> Ah, no mention of Times, and Nimbus embedded. It's a big file though,
> ~120,000 bytes compared with ~4,000 if -Tps and ps2pdf is used to also
> embed Nimbus. I guess the latter picks just certain runes?
gropdf is very simple; it doesn't subset fonts. To get a small output
file you should use GhostScript:
ps2pdf z.pdf z-optimized.pdf
This reduces the PDF file size to ~4kByte.
> Presuambly, troff has used Times' metrics before that?
Yes. They should be fully compatible, IIRC.
Werner
- [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ted Harding, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Werner LEMBERG, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/06