[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular. |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2016 10:53:45 +0100 |
Hi Werner,
> > Should I be telling groff that I want to use those Nimbus fonts so
> > it uses their metrics rather than the "almost identical" Times'
> > ones?
>
> If you use the gropdf output device, try groff's `-P -y -P U' option
> to use the URW fonts.
Using -Tpdf gives a PDF that refers to Times-Roman and doesn't embed my
local Nimbus substitute. Adding `-P -y -P U' didn't change the PDF
produced, apart from expected CreationDate, trailer's ID, etc.
/usr/share/groff/1.22.3/font/devpdf/download has only the "blank"
foundry, with no mention of Times. Arch Linux groff 1.22.3-6.
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ted Harding, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Werner LEMBERG, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular.,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Deri James, 2016/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Times-Roman v. Nimbus Roman No9 L Regular., Ralph Corderoy, 2016/05/06