[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?
|
From: |
Larry McVoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:30:06 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:42:41PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Either way, groff is enough better that I wouldn't look back.
>
> It might be interesting to compare with heirloom troff which has
> native support for OpenType fonts, and which supports almost all of
> the groff extensions.
Yeah, that would make a lot more sense.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Larry McVoy, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Larry Kollar, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, brian m. carlson, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Charlie Kester, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Larry Kollar, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Clarke Echols, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Groff] Replacing groff with troff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/06/02