Re: [Groff] .als problem

[Werner LEMBERG]

> So what you're saying is that if I have
> 
>   .als bar foo
> 
> then
> 
>   .de bar
> 
> will redefine the common object to which *both* "foo" and "bar"
> point (so "foo" will also see the new definition), but
> 
>   .rm bar
> 
> will *not* remove the object, just the link (unless it's the only
> link to the object, in which case the object will be removed, too).
> The same thing goes for removing "foo".

Exactly.


    Werner