groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] The case against the case against .EX/.EE & .DS/.DE


From: Gunnar Ritter
Subject: Re: [Groff] The case against the case against .EX/.EE & .DS/.DE
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:25:08 +0100
User-agent: Heirloom mailx 12.2pre 12/28/06

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:

>   http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap12.html
>
> However, those rules are not really helpful IMHO in our discussion how
> such macros should look like.

It gives an overview about the types of arguments that need
to be handled by such macros. For example, it shows that
there are non-optional options for which .OP in the given
form is also not sufficient.

In the real world outside the standard, there are also
other types of arguments, e.g. optional option-arguments.

A -man extension for the public should be comprehensive
enough to handle all these cases.

        Gunnar




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]