Re: [Groff] groff for old macro packages

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > Instead of fixing this I would like to get rid of these wrappers
> > completely -- is this really used today?  Wouldn't people rather
> > expect that calling groff causes groff's incarnations of ms, mm,
> > etc.  macros be used by default?  Is there any advantage?
> 
> Yes, it's really used today.  Some of the macro package
> reimplementations, particularly mm, leave a lot to be desired, so
> convenient access to the original macro packages is needed.
> (There's also the case of existing documents that engage in
> unwaranted chumminess with the macro package that don't work right
> with the reimplementations.)

OK, I've reimplemented wrapper support -- those system-specific
wrapper files are now installed in /usr/local/lib/groff/site-tmac.

Please test!


    Werner