[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2022 12:12:19 -0700 |
Yo Anton!
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:05:10 +0200
Anton Strydom <agstrydom@gmail.com> wrote:
> I design and develop hardware and use Beagles and Pi's purely for
> their UARTS and USB ports for developing low cost accurate GPS and
> long distance communications transmitting video for the monitoring of
> structures.
Yup, many of us here doing similar.
> I used RTKLIB for the hardware development
Uh, RTKLIB is software?
> The luxury of 9 professionally surveyed and post processed markers at
> your disposal has made a huge difference to my development plus the
> markers are in a typical urban type environment where there is lots
> of multipath, restricted skyviews etc. that needed to be overcome to
> develop the device
Many of us here do our own PPP to a high accuracy. But nice to have
professional confirmation.
> Below is a data set collected as follows, the unit was assembled and
> the antenna placed on a brick marked with a piece of chalk. The
> receiver was turned on and a position as indicated below was logged.
> Position 1 differs by 1.12 meters from the rest and was done on
> purpose, the balance differs 1 to 4 cm. The receiver was then powered
> down and disassembled. The process was repeated hourly with the
> receiver powered down and disassembled as well as removing the
> antenna and placing it as close as humanly possible to its previous
> position marked with chalk.
Hourly? That will miss almmost all of the "interesting" data points.
> The positions (waypoints) were logged with Global Mapper and please
> disregard the height.
A fair tart on the data, but where is your data analysis? CEP(50),
CEP(95), etc?
> The reason for all my questions is that it is easier for the survey
> community to work with ECEF than lat lon for a number of reasons.
Of course. Which is why gpsd dowrks well with ECEF.
OTOH, no receiver tells us which ECEF they are using...
> The datum is changeable on all the receivers I use, if it cannot be
> displayed
> it is not the end of the world but would help a lot.
Once again, if you receiver sends it, then gpsd will pass it along.
But an accurate datum requires a very large data table. No receiver I
know has a complate and accurate datum. If you need accuracy, you need
to just take the ECEF and externally compute lat/lon/alt.
> GPSD is used in the navigation side of the new system where the track,
> latitude and longitude values are used with a precise PPS input to
> calculate course and distance and navigate the vehicle using skid
> steer.
Very common, especially on boats. On a boat, skidding is your only
steering option.
> I am long past the proving accuracy phase
Not without a 24 hour gpsprof you aren't.
> and am looking at developing
> something meaningful to compliment the receiver and from all my
> research GPSD looks like it ticks a number of boxes for me
Good. Let us know if there are easy improvements we can make.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpYz1UCw90mo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature