[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing |
Date: |
Tue, 5 May 2020 12:37:34 -0700 |
Yo John!
On Tue, 5 May 2020 15:33:54 -0400
John Ackermann N8UR <address@hidden> wrote:
> > You have been spoiled! YOu got to use P(Y)!
>
> See, those ancient Z-12s and (slightly less ancient) NetRS units have
> their value. I still have a couple of working Z12s but mainly use the
> NetRS as my "real" reference these days.
The security clearance you need for P(Y) also helps.
> > Should gpsrinex have an option to not include L2C data?
>
> I don't know. I'm afraid that would effectively turn the F9* into
> single frequency receivers.
Thus the need for more testing.
I hope you write this up nicely for others to learn with less pain.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpzmNLuU0VLP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing, John Ackermann N8UR, 2020/05/05
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing, Svenn Are Bjerkem, 2020/05/05
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing, Greg Troxel, 2020/05/06
Re: ZED-F9P and PPP processing, Greg Troxel, 2020/05/06