On Sep 15, 2004, at 4:35 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-09-15 10:33:09 +0100 David Ayers <address@hidden> wrote:
I think this shows that it is very important that we find some kind
of
review mechanism for such updates to the web pages, so that we as a
community feel represented by the content.
It would help immensely if the CVS didn't randomly deny me access and
the site updated from CVS a little more frequently, so that we
weren't measuring bugfix times in days.
Definitely.
Manuel, can you set the main web site to update more often?
It doesn't seem like hourly would be too much of a burden. I think the
CVS thing was temporary (see http://savannah.gnu.org)
Now we're not hosting the web archive on Savannah any more, why not
move to GNU Arch? Then we can have some committers automatically
merged, some requiring review and anyone being able to have all the
revision control features for their edits. Downside is that
submitters either mail patches (as at present) or need file space for
publishing their archive (but http or ftp is fine).
Well, the CVS is on savannah. Were you thinking of moving it to a
different machine?