Re: NSBundle - supporting foreign bundles

[Chan Maxthon]

Well if Windows is not involved that is no issue. However with Windows in mind 
you have to notice that neither the format for mobile storage devices that can 
r/w out of the box on both Windows and UNIX systems which generally is FAT32, 
nor the Windows network share protocol which generally is SMB/CIFS supported 
that. That is, despite NTFS does both symbolic and hard links, I cannot easily 
transfer it from a UNIX system (I generally develop on OS X) to a Windows 
system.

发自我的 iPhone

在 2013-5-23，1:59，Niels Grewe <address@hidden> 写道：

> 
> On 22.05.2013 18:47BST Chan Maxthon <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> What I meant is not to use links but a common filesystem layout, as I may 
>> need to transfer the bundles through formats that does not accept symlinks. 
>> Binaries are compiled and linked separately, while the resources are shared, 
>> so library issue can be spotted and hunted architecture by architecture.
> 
> *sigh* I give up. If you were willing or competent enough to check out the 
> non-flattened/multi-platform layout yourself, you would see that it does what 
> you describe (i.e. have architecture dependent stuff stored in properly 
> namespaces directories and architecture-independent resources shared). Since 
> you clearly are not, I don't see any use in trying to help you anymore.
> 
> PS: Incidentally, there is no major platform that still comes with a 
> filesystem that does not support symbolic links.  Even NTFS has that feature, 
> either as proper symlinks or as junction points. (mklink's the command)