[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next GNUstep release?
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Next GNUstep release? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:39:16 +0000 |
On 26 Mar 2010, at 19:55, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> What still needs to be done in gui is finishing the switch to #import,
> moving on to non fragile ivars will happen later. I first want to see
> the results base gets with its approach to that topic.
I made some small changes in -gui last night that remove the uses of @defs,
making it compatible with the non-fragile ABI. You can now compile -base and
-gui with the non-fragile ABI. I've not tried -back yet, but I think it should
work too.
David
-- Sent from my STANTEC-ZEBRA
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, (continued)
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2010/03/27
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Wolfgang Lux, 2010/03/27
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Gregory Casamento, 2010/03/27
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Wolfgang Lux, 2010/03/28
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Gregory Casamento, 2010/03/29
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Fred Kiefer, 2010/03/29
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Wolfgang Lux, 2010/03/30
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Fred Kiefer, 2010/03/30
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Wolfgang Lux, 2010/03/30
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Fred Kiefer, 2010/03/30
Re: Next GNUstep release?,
David Chisnall <=
Re: Next GNUstep release?, Quentin Mathé, 2010/03/27
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Gregory Casamento, 2010/03/27
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/03/28
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Gregory Casamento, 2010/03/28
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Riccardo Mottola, 2010/03/29
- Re: Next GNUstep release?, Gregory Casamento, 2010/03/30