Re: libgnustep-base split proposal ... alternative ideas

[Yen-Ju Chen]

On 2/19/06, Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 19 Feb 2006, at 05:27, Andrew Ruder wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Possible setups might be ...
>
> Linux FHS installation (really just needs implementing in gnustep-make)

I guess his point is that someone may just want to compile GNUstep-base
as libgnustep-base.so and install it in /usr/local/lib and link it
without the whole GNUstep/ directories.
In this way, it might be easier to ship something in binary format.
If this can be done, a document probably will do.

Yen-Ju

[snip]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>