Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?

[Alessio Vanni]

Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> writes:

> Yes, we should modify the code along the lines of your proposal.
>
> -Christian

Then does the attached patch sound reasonable?

As the commit message says, it adds the 'agpl_url' field and
automatically adds a handler when that field is not NULL.  There is also
a patch for gnunet-ext adding that field to the project data structure.

Thanks,
A.V.

P.S. the problem that started this whole discussion in the end was
found.  It had nothing to do with GNUnet (I made an error in the code I
wrote), but if anything it provided some improvements (if the patch is
accepted) to GNUnet...

0001-Make-REQUEST_AGPL-messages-configurable-and-add-hand.patch
Description: Patch for GNUnet

0001-Add-agpl_url-field.patch
Description: Patch for gnunet-ext