[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 May 2020 10:31:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
On 5/23/20 12:48 AM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
> Thank you. It's better than nothing I suppose; at least I'm not left
> here scratching my head, as I can look into those places you suggested.
> Anyway, if possible I'd still like to know why `GNUNET_SERVICE_start'
> adds a handler for that type of message. It's convenient for the core
> which might actually use those messages, but unless there is another
> reason you might want to add it from a function not used to deal with
> third-party applications too. I mean, it's still adding a handler for
> message type 6 which might be an application-specific message type...
Actually, no. Type 6 implements our *Affero* GPL mechanism to provide
anyone who accesses *any* GNUnet service with the means to download the
source code. GNUnet is released under the AGPL, which specifically
states that such a mechanism to obtain the source must not be disabled.
So a third-party application would be in violation of the AGPL license
if it disabled this particular handler. Basically, that's the one
"freedom" the *Affero* GPL takes away: the freedom to remove or disable
a "download source" mechanism.
Now, admittedly it could be documented better, but it was mostly added
as a quick hack before a release when we switched to the AGPL.
Finally, in general we'll want even third-party applications to use
message types that are "registered" globally. We recently setup
https://gana.gnunet.org/ which will be used to facilitate this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Alessio Vanni, 2020/05/22
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Christian Grothoff, 2020/05/22
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Alessio Vanni, 2020/05/22
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Alessio Vanni, 2020/05/23
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Christian Grothoff, 2020/05/23
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Alessio Vanni, 2020/05/25
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Christian Grothoff, 2020/05/25
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Alessio Vanni, 2020/05/27
- Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Christian Grothoff, 2020/05/27
Re: Is there a reason why GNUnet forcefully sends a message of type 6?, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2020/05/23